OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

--- Clinical Tools

Logo
OpiCalc
ABC-AF Bleeding ScoreABC-AF Stroke ScoreABCD2 ScoreADD-RSAortic Valve Calcium ScoreAPPLE ScoreASCVD (Pooled Cohort)AVA (Continuity Equation)BAG-AHF ScoreBiplane Simpson EFBlood Pressure PercentilesBrugada Criteria (VT vs SVT)Cardiac Output IndexCHA2DS2-VAScCHADS2Cornell Voltage CriteriaCRUSADE Bleeding ScoreDAPT ScoreDASIDuke Treadmill ScoreE/A RatioEDACS ScoreEHMRGEHRA ScoreEmbolic Risk ScoreEROA (PISA Method)EuroSCORE IIFFR (Fractional Flow Reserve)Fick Cardiac OutputFramingham 10-Year RiskFriedewald LDL EquationGorlin EquationGRACE ScoreGupta MICA (NSQIP)GWTG-HF ScoreH2FPEF ScoreHakki FormulaHAS-BLEDHEART PathwayHEART ScoreHEMORR2HAGEShs-Troponin 0h/1h ESC AlgorithmiFRINTERCHEST ScoreKillip ClassificationLee's RCRILV Mass IndexLV Stroke Work IndexMAGGIC Risk ScoreMAP CalculatorMartin/Hopkins LDLModified Duke CriteriaModified Sgarbossa CriteriaMVA (Pressure Half-Time)Non-HDL CholesterolNT-proBNP Age-Adjusted ThresholdsORBIT ScoreOttawa Heart Failure RiskPulse PressurePVR CalculatorPVR IndexQRISK3QTc (Bazett)QTc (Fridericia)REVEAL 2.0 ScoreReynolds Risk ScoreROSIRVSP CalculatorSchwartz Score (LQTS)SCORE2Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)Sgarbossa CriteriaShock IndexSokolow-Lyon VoltageStroke Volume IndexSVR CalculatorSYNTAX ScoreSYNTAX Score IITAPSETeichholz FormulaTIMI (STEMI)TIMI (UA/NSTEMI)Troponin Delta CalculatorValvular GradientsVancouver Chest Pain RuleVereckei AlgorithmWATCHDM ScoreWilkins ScoreWood Units Calculator

Clinical Evidence and Methodology

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Clinical Reference Hub

Curated insights • How it Works • Practical Pearls • Evidence Base

CLINICAL INSIGHT

When to Use

When to Use

  • Adult patients ≥ 18 years presenting with chest pain to Emergency or Internal Medicine
  • Stratify risk of 30-day MACE (death, MI, or revascularisation)
  • Guide decision between early discharge vs admission and invasive workup
  • Combine with serial troponins (at 0h and 2–3h) for optimal accuracy

HEART Score + Troponin Algorithm

HEART score alone is not sufficient. Always combine with two serial high-sensitivity troponin measurements. A HEART 0–3 + two negative hs-troponins = 30-day MACE risk < 2% → safe early discharge.

CLINICAL INSIGHT

How it Works

Five Components (0–2 points each)

  • H — History: Ischaemic character of chest pain
  • E — ECG: ST deviation, LBBB, LVH, or repolarisation changes
  • A — Age: < 45 = 0, 45–64 = 1, ≥ 65 = 2
  • R — Risk factors: Known atherosclerosis scores 2; ≥ 3 risk factors = 2; 1–2 risk factors = 1
  • T — Troponin: ≤ normal = 0; 1–3× ULN = 1; > 3× ULN = 2

Risk Strata

  • Score 0–3 (Low): 1.7% MACE. Early discharge safe with negative troponins.
  • Score 4–6 (Moderate): 12% MACE. Observation, serial troponins, stress testing.
  • Score 7–10 (High): 65% MACE. Early invasive strategy — catheterisation lab consultation.
CLINICAL INSIGHT

Practical Pearls

Comparison to TIMI and GRACE

  • HEART is simpler than GRACE (no haemodynamics calculation required)
  • HEART is better calibrated for ED chest pain than TIMI (which was derived in ACS patients)
  • HEART score has been validated in > 50,000 patients across 20+ countries

Known ECG/Troponin Limitation

LBBB pattern (paced or Sgarbossa-negative) can score a false +2 on ECG domain. In LBBB patients, apply Sgarbossa or modified Sgarbossa criteria to assess for STEMI equivalence separately.

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Next Steps

Disposition Algorithm

  • HEART 0–3 + 2 negative hs-troponins: Discharge home. Outpatient cardiology/stress test within 72h.
  • HEART 4–6: Observation unit or admit. Stress test or coronary CTA. Cardiology consult.
  • HEART 7–10: Full ACS management. Antiplatelet therapy. Anticoagulation. Urgent cath lab referral.

Complementary Tools

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Evidence Base

Original Derivation

Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score.

Six AJ, Backus BE, Kerkenaar JM.Netherlands Heart Journal.2008

Prospective Validation

A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department.

Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JH, et al.International Journal of Cardiology.2013
CLINICAL INSIGHT

Background

HEART Score Development

Developed in the Netherlands by AJ Six and colleagues in 2008 as a simple bedside tool combining five clinical domains, each scored 0–2. Its elegant acronym (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, Troponin) allows recall without a calculator. It has since become the dominant chest pain pathway tool in emergency medicine globally.

HEART Score

HEART Score: Predicts 6-week MACE in chest pain patients presenting to the ED.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Clinical Reference Hub

Curated insights • How it Works • Practical Pearls • Evidence Base

CLINICAL INSIGHT

When to Use

When to Use

  • Adult patients ≥ 18 years presenting with chest pain to Emergency or Internal Medicine
  • Stratify risk of 30-day MACE (death, MI, or revascularisation)
  • Guide decision between early discharge vs admission and invasive workup
  • Combine with serial troponins (at 0h and 2–3h) for optimal accuracy

HEART Score + Troponin Algorithm

HEART score alone is not sufficient. Always combine with two serial high-sensitivity troponin measurements. A HEART 0–3 + two negative hs-troponins = 30-day MACE risk < 2% → safe early discharge.

CLINICAL INSIGHT

How it Works

Five Components (0–2 points each)

  • H — History: Ischaemic character of chest pain
  • E — ECG: ST deviation, LBBB, LVH, or repolarisation changes
  • A — Age: < 45 = 0, 45–64 = 1, ≥ 65 = 2
  • R — Risk factors: Known atherosclerosis scores 2; ≥ 3 risk factors = 2; 1–2 risk factors = 1
  • T — Troponin: ≤ normal = 0; 1–3× ULN = 1; > 3× ULN = 2

Risk Strata

  • Score 0–3 (Low): 1.7% MACE. Early discharge safe with negative troponins.
  • Score 4–6 (Moderate): 12% MACE. Observation, serial troponins, stress testing.
  • Score 7–10 (High): 65% MACE. Early invasive strategy — catheterisation lab consultation.
CLINICAL INSIGHT

Practical Pearls

Comparison to TIMI and GRACE

  • HEART is simpler than GRACE (no haemodynamics calculation required)
  • HEART is better calibrated for ED chest pain than TIMI (which was derived in ACS patients)
  • HEART score has been validated in > 50,000 patients across 20+ countries

Known ECG/Troponin Limitation

LBBB pattern (paced or Sgarbossa-negative) can score a false +2 on ECG domain. In LBBB patients, apply Sgarbossa or modified Sgarbossa criteria to assess for STEMI equivalence separately.

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Next Steps

Disposition Algorithm

  • HEART 0–3 + 2 negative hs-troponins: Discharge home. Outpatient cardiology/stress test within 72h.
  • HEART 4–6: Observation unit or admit. Stress test or coronary CTA. Cardiology consult.
  • HEART 7–10: Full ACS management. Antiplatelet therapy. Anticoagulation. Urgent cath lab referral.

Complementary Tools

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Evidence Base

Original Derivation

Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score.

Six AJ, Backus BE, Kerkenaar JM.Netherlands Heart Journal.2008

Prospective Validation

A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department.

Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JH, et al.International Journal of Cardiology.2013
CLINICAL INSIGHT

Background

HEART Score Development

Developed in the Netherlands by AJ Six and colleagues in 2008 as a simple bedside tool combining five clinical domains, each scored 0–2. Its elegant acronym (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, Troponin) allows recall without a calculator. It has since become the dominant chest pain pathway tool in emergency medicine globally.