OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

--- Clinical Tools

Logo
OpiCalc
ABC-AF Bleeding ScoreABC-AF Stroke ScoreABCD2 ScoreADD-RSAortic Valve Calcium ScoreAPPLE ScoreASCVD (Pooled Cohort)AVA (Continuity Equation)BAG-AHF ScoreBiplane Simpson EFBlood Pressure PercentilesBrugada Criteria (VT vs SVT)Cardiac Output IndexCHA2DS2-VAScCHADS2Cornell Voltage CriteriaCRUSADE Bleeding ScoreDAPT ScoreDASIDuke Treadmill ScoreE/A RatioEDACS ScoreEHMRGEHRA ScoreEmbolic Risk ScoreEROA (PISA Method)EuroSCORE IIFFR (Fractional Flow Reserve)Fick Cardiac OutputFramingham 10-Year RiskFriedewald LDL EquationGorlin EquationGRACE ScoreGupta MICA (NSQIP)GWTG-HF ScoreH2FPEF ScoreHakki FormulaHAS-BLEDHEART PathwayHEART ScoreHEMORR2HAGEShs-Troponin 0h/1h ESC AlgorithmiFRINTERCHEST ScoreKillip ClassificationLee's RCRILV Mass IndexLV Stroke Work IndexMAGGIC Risk ScoreMAP CalculatorMartin/Hopkins LDLModified Duke CriteriaModified Sgarbossa CriteriaMVA (Pressure Half-Time)Non-HDL CholesterolNT-proBNP Age-Adjusted ThresholdsORBIT ScoreOttawa Heart Failure RiskPulse PressurePVR CalculatorPVR IndexQRISK3QTc (Bazett)QTc (Fridericia)REVEAL 2.0 ScoreReynolds Risk ScoreROSIRVSP CalculatorSchwartz Score (LQTS)SCORE2Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)Sgarbossa CriteriaShock IndexSokolow-Lyon VoltageStroke Volume IndexSVR CalculatorSYNTAX ScoreSYNTAX Score IITAPSETeichholz FormulaTIMI (STEMI)TIMI (UA/NSTEMI)Troponin Delta CalculatorValvular GradientsVancouver Chest Pain RuleVereckei AlgorithmWATCHDM ScoreWilkins ScoreWood Units Calculator

Clinical Evidence and Methodology

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Clinical Reference Hub

Curated insights • How it Works • Practical Pearls • Evidence Base

CLINICAL INSIGHT

When to Use

When to Use

  • Evaluation of suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction in the presence of LBBB.
  • Proposed as a more sensitive alternative to the original Sgarbossa criteria.
CLINICAL INSIGHT

How it Works

Smith’s Modification

The original 3rd Sgarbossa criterion (≥ 5mm discordant ST elevation) was found to be poor at discriminating AMI. Smith modified this to a proportional rule.

The S/T Ratio

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Practical Pearls

Sensitivity Boost

The modified criteria increase sensitivity from ~20-30% to ~80% while maintaining high specificity (~99%). It is now widely recommended over the original criteria in emergency medicine.

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Next Steps

Complementary Calculators

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Evidence Base

Validation Study

Diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block with the ST-elevation to S-wave ratio in a modified Sgarbossa rule.

Smith SW, et al.Ann Emerg Med.2012

Modified Sgarbossa Criteria

Modified Sgarbossa: Identifies acute MI in patients with LBBB or Ventricular Paced rhythms.

Concordant ST Elevation ≥ 1mm

ST elevation in a lead with a positive QRS complex (most specific).

Concordant ST Depression ≥ 1mm in V1-V3

ST depression in leads with negative QRS (V1, V2, or V3).

Discordant ST/S ratio ≤ -0.25

Excessive discordance: ST elevation height / S wave depth ≤ -0.25 (Modified Smith criterion).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Clinical Reference Hub

Curated insights • How it Works • Practical Pearls • Evidence Base

CLINICAL INSIGHT

When to Use

When to Use

  • Evaluation of suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction in the presence of LBBB.
  • Proposed as a more sensitive alternative to the original Sgarbossa criteria.
CLINICAL INSIGHT

How it Works

Smith’s Modification

The original 3rd Sgarbossa criterion (≥ 5mm discordant ST elevation) was found to be poor at discriminating AMI. Smith modified this to a proportional rule.

The S/T Ratio

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Practical Pearls

Sensitivity Boost

The modified criteria increase sensitivity from ~20-30% to ~80% while maintaining high specificity (~99%). It is now widely recommended over the original criteria in emergency medicine.

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Next Steps

Complementary Calculators

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Evidence Base

Validation Study

Diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block with the ST-elevation to S-wave ratio in a modified Sgarbossa rule.

Smith SW, et al.Ann Emerg Med.2012