MRD Sensitivity: Assessing the "depth" of clinical remission. NGS (10⁻⁶) is significantly more sensitive than standard flow.
Sensitivity Threshold
1 in 100,000 cells
Enabled by: Next-Gen Flow (NGF)
Clinical Use Case
Current NCCN/EHA minimum for MRD-negativity in trials.
Comparison
100x more sensitive than standard flow.
Guidelines & Evidence
Clinical Details
Section 1
When to Use
When to Use
Interpreting Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) results in patients with Multiple Myeloma, CLL, or AML.
Evaluating the sensitivity of the assay (Flow vs. NGS).
Applying IMWG or ELN definitions for MRD negativity.
Patient Population
Patients in clinical remission (e.g., CR or sCR) who are being assessed for deeper molecular or cellular responses.
Section 2
Formula & Logic
Sensitivity Levels
Threshold
Meaning (1 in X cells)
Standard Method
10⁻⁴
1 in 10,000
Standard multi-parameter flow
10⁻⁵
1 in 100,000
NGF (Next Gen Flow) / NCCN Minimum
10⁻⁶
1 in 1,000,000
NGS (Next Gen Sequencing) / IMWG standard
IMWG MRD Definitions
MRD Negativity: Absence of clonal plasma cells by NGF or NGS at a minimum sensitivity of 1 in 10⁵.
Sustained MRD Negativity: MRD negativity confirmed ≥ 1 year apart.
Imaging MRD-Negative: Complete metabolic response (PET/CT) in addition to cellular MRD negativity.
Section 3
Pearls/Pitfalls
Flow vs. NGS
Next-Generation Flow (NGF) provides rapid results (hours) but depends on fresh samples. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) offers higher sensitivity (10⁻⁶) and can use stored samples, but requires a baseline tracking sample (the "molecular signature").
Prognostic Power
In Multiple Myeloma, achieving MRD negativity is a more powerful predictor of survival than achieving a clinical CR. It is increasingly used as a surrogate endpoint for drug approval.
Section 4
Evidence Appraisal
Primary Consensus
International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma.
Kumar S et al. • Lancet Oncology. 2016;17(8):e328-e346.